More than a year after the COVID-19 pandemic hit the world and sent almost everyone home, people are getting ready to return to classrooms, workplaces and public spaces as they adapt to a new normal of rules, conditions and restrictions. Post-Covid architecture is in the spotlight today with the design and construction industry engaged in an important conversation to improve sustainability, promote better and safer buildings, and prioritise occupants’ wellbeing above all else.

Stronger scientific evidence and experts’ suggestions now point to smarter, automated ventilation as an integral part of such post-Covid building standards.

A simulation on educational environment

In February 2021, The New York Times collaborated with leading engineers, specialists in building systems and experts from Harvard University to build a simulation using 800,000 points of data. Although there are slight differences in classroom design between New York and Australian cities, the simulation reveals important facts on how ventilation helps limit aerosol transmission in educational facilities in specific and all public spaces in general.

According to the study, the lack of sufficient ventilation creates an ideal environment for airborne virus to spread around and transmit. It is estimated that 3% of the air each person in the room breathes are exhaled by other people.

This image illustrates how the breath of an infected person disperses throughout the room when all windows are closed. The darker lines signal where the contaminants are most concentrated. Within a short period of time and without fresh air coming into the room, the contaminants quickly circulate and remain, posing high health risks for occupants.

Simulation - closed windows

The situation gets better when we leave a window open because fresh air coming into the room helps dilute the contaminants, lowering the risk of exposure for other people in the room. In the simulation, experts manage to achieve four air exchanges per hour.

Simulation - one window open

The best scenario comes from integration between natural airflow and mechanical systems (in this case the addition of a fan and an air cleaner). Instead of dispersing throughout the room, the contaminants focus only where the fan is blowing and are diluted everywhere else.

Simulation - integrated airflow systems

The simulation once again proves that it is not just about natural ventilation. The smarter, pandemic-proof solution should be an automated, integrated operation of high free air windows and the building management system (BMS). That change in standard and perception now receives more and more support from leading experts in Australia.

Experts call for changes to the National Construction Code (NCC)

In a recent interview with ABC News, Professor Geoff Hanmer from the University of Adelaide expressed his concern as “the way that we deal with naturally ventilated buildings. That's most aged care facilities or schools. When people shut the windows because it's cold outside, there's no ventilation. And the level of ventilation reaches hazardous levels quite quickly.”

While significant improvements were introduced to the NCC 2019 in terms of glazing, ventilation, filtration, air changes per hour etc., there are strong calls for standards and requirements to be updated to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in built spaces as well as for the overall health and wellbeing of building occupants. Many recommendations centre on window automation and building management systems, applicable for both new builds and retrofitting existing buildings, following Australia’s hard-earned lessons with hotel quarantine and outdated ventilation systems.

Joining the conversation, Professor Catherine Bennett at Deakin University also agrees upon the evidence of COVID-19 as an aerosol transmission and encoding safety regulations are “something we should move to, particularly for aged care, or for our quarantine centres...”

The changing ventilation standards in a variety of settings, she hopes, could be “a legacy of the global pandemic” towards a safer living environment.

Introducing the SmartAir system and free motor initiative

Well-known for challenging and overcoming the design, security and safety limitations of conventional louvre windows, Safetyline Jalousie is addressing these new calls for better ventilation performance with turnkey solutions.

In collaboration with Blue Squared Window Automation, Safetyline Jalousie introduces the SmartAir System, a pre-programmable, fully automated and tested air quality solution that enables all spaces to monitor temperature, CO2 and humidity.

This will inform, cue and operate high performance motorised louvre windows that have 86% free air coupled with superior sealing capabilities that block wind, water, air and noise.

SmartAir System

The SmartAir system is Safetyline Jalousie’s contribution to safeguarding the health and wellbeing of kids and adults alike across Australia, particularly those segments of the population that are considered to be more vulnerable during and post-COVID. We also believe that every project and space is entitled to the benefits of motorising and automating the monitoring and control of air quality.

With that in mind, and in conjunction with the SmartAir Proposal, Safetyline Jalousie would like to offer the opportunity to add our SmartAir louvre motors to any windows quote for:

  • Australian Education Projects
  • Australian Aged Care Projects
  • Australian Social Housing Projects

This includes retrofitting existing projects along with both present and future builds. By offering motorised louvre windows at the same cost of manually operated windows, Safetyline Jalousie hopes to alleviate any cost-prohibiting factors that would influence the quality outcome of the project.

Source credits:

* All simulation image credits belong to The New York Times.

* Why Opening Windows Is A Key To Reopening Schools – The New York Times.

* Experts Call For Changes To Australian Ventilation Standards In Bid To Pandemic-Proof Buildings – ABC News.